Fantastic, thank you. On Nov 30, 6:19 pm, Oren Teich <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct - it's because 2.3.5 is now in your slug. > > We're in the process of adding 2.3.5 to our machines. By the end of the > week the next slug recompile should no longer include 2.3.5. > > Oren > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kyle Bragger <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > Just pushed a deploy and updated .gems file to use rails 2.3.5 and latest > > rack - noticed that slug size ballooned to ~6mb, but this is not the case > > when using Rails lte 2.3.4... How come? Some difference between gems > > installed by default and those that are not? Can we expect latest rails to > > be (eventually) included in the default list? > > > Thanks, > > Kyle > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Heroku" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<heroku%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
