On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:19 PM, D&J Gredler wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the info. We're pretty much done with out benchmarking
here, our results are at:
http://daniel.gredler.net/2008/01/07/java-remoting-protocol-
benchmarks/
Interesting.
What method did you use to invoke Hessian?
I just checked with the HessianProxy and it uses Hessian 1.0 by
default, so I'm curious if the results are for Hessian 1.0 or 2.0.
> As far as I can tell, Caucho’s Burlap is essentially Hessian-in-XML.
Historically, it's the other way around. Hessian is Burlap-in-binary.
-- Scott
Regards,
Daniel
On Jan 2, 2008 6:10 PM, Scott Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Daniel Gredler wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone aware of any benchmarks comparing Hessian and/or Burlap
to other (Java) remoting technologies? I'm working on some
benchmarks and would like to compare results, once I'm done.
Not recently. The Hessian2 implementation should be faster and
more compact than java.io serialization. I'm not sure how it would
compare to RMI, since RMI doesn't have the HTTP overhead.
Burlap should be much slower than Hessian. And the original
Hessian is significantly slower, partially due to the protocol, but
also because the Hessian2 implementation improved things like
buffering.
-- Scott
--
Daniel Gredler
http://daniel.gredler.net/
_______________________________________________
hessian-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/hessian-interest
_______________________________________________
hessian-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/hessian-interest
