That WOULD work, epecially if it had a float valve as the big, traditional 
rooftop and window swamp coolers do.

Wonder if 50 gallons is overkill? 

The big ones don't need constant steady flow from a water source because they 
recirculate the water that drips into the catch tray at the bottom. They do let 
water seep constantly onto the pads from the top and turn on the water source 
flow (via the float valve) any time to the top reservoir tray gets low.

Must be some way to integrate a float between a bulk source of water hanging 
(or mounted) above the swamp cooler. Or....

maybe just use an IV valve -- the little plastic pinch device on the tube 
running from an IV bag -- to control the rate of flow.

Still, at some point, you probably will get overflow of the catch tray on the 
bottom. So need to design for that, too. Since water is precious, and 
particularly in desert environments where you haul it in, would be nice to 
design a way to catch -- and later re-use -- any overflow. Wouldn't be hard to 
do. Just another tube and container, this one below the unit. Then once or 
twice a day, empty the overflow container into the source container.

We're getting closer here to a very low energy efficient evaporative cooler, 
Richard!

-- ken winston caine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Richard Ginn 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [hexayurt] Windows and COOLING on the PLAYA


another way to have water flow down over the material is with a large reservoir 
(plastic garbage can) above it that you refill by hand (bucket) as needed.  50 
gallons would trickle down all night maybe? 


On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:31 AM, ken winston caine 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  Pretty amazing amount of pumping for 6 watts, Richard.

  Still, if I'm running it 24 hours a day (along with the fan) during the 
current 100-plus degree days and high 70s to high 80s nights until about 4 a.m. 
when finally it starts to cool down a little, I'm using 282 watts a day. That's 
1/5 of the total electricity I have available each non-overcast day from my 
solar system. That's a pretty big bite and I can probably afford it only a day 
or two a week and keep the system healthy. 

  It's NOTHING if you're on the grid. And a wonderful savings compared to 
typical pumps.

  Best,
  ken winston caine

  P.S. Am going to look into it, anyway. Because it would be really nice to be 
able to use it if only from 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. or so when the inside of my RV 
heats up into the middle 90s most days this time of year. My self-wicking 
coolers bring the air right in front of me and on my face down to the mid 80s 
while I'm working at my desk, which is much more tolerable than mid 90s. But if 
I could force more water into the pads, and add pads, I could get better 
cooling. 

  Have been meaning to hook up the Kill-a-Watt meter up to an aquarium pump and 
see what kind of wattage it draws. If it's less than 6 watts, I'll report that 
here. (Doubt that it will be.)


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Ginn 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [hexayurt] Windows and COOLING on the PLAYA


  For 6 watts you can power a 12-volt CPU water cooling pump that is rated at 
132 gallons per hour, and then you don't have to wick the water at all:

  
http://www.frozencpu.com/products/6073/ex-pmp-53/Danger_Den_DD-CPX1_12V_3-Pin_Powered_Pump_-_DD-CPX1.html?tl=g30c107s153


  On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:11 PM, ken winston caine 
<[email protected]> wrote:

    Jack, I've experimented with developing a 7-watt, self-wicking swamp cooler
    that works pretty well.

    Haven't experimented with EVERY fabric known to man, but did find,
    surprisingly, that absorbant paper towels tended to wick better than about
    any cloth fabric I could test.But even., then, they tend to wick up only
    about 6 inches above the water surface.

    What really helps is to hang them with open pleats facing the air source and
    allowing a tiny bit of air space between each hanging wick. That allows the
    air to pass between them a tiny bit. If using a high-efficiency, low-wattage
    12v fan made for use in RVs and campers, having the open end of the pleat
    facing the fan's exhaust also helps the pleats balloon a bit and speeds
    evaporation.

    My design provides 8 to 10 degree cooling for about 5 feet in front of the
    swamp cooler exhaust. So it's a personal cooler, not a room cooler. Although
    it does noticeably help cool the room a tiny bit, so long as you have fresh
    air vents in the room bringing in occasional super dry gusts. That's when
    you notice the moisture evaporating in areas of the room other than directly
    in front of the cooler.

    The more folds of wicking material you can fit in your box (if buidling a
    swamp cooler) the more cooling effect you'll get.

    Have yet to experiment with putting the fan on the top of the box, ponting
    down at the wicks and water tray on the bottom. Am planning to test that
    next.

    Have tried quite a few variations. Have found that the fan BEHIND the wicks,
    blowing air through them, provides better cooling than locating the fan in
    front of the wicks so that it *draws* the air through the wicks.

    Also have found that having a larger intake opening than exhaust opening
    seems to help a bit, too. About a 2::1 ratio has seemed best in my
    experiments.

    You can do these with cardboard boxes and duct tape and  rubber maid
    shoe-box size plastic containers.

    The type of fan I use is this:
    
http://www.campingworld.com/shopping/item/fan-tastic-endless-breeze-12v-fan/38132

    I also found at the end of summer about six years ago at a Wal Mart in
    Albuquerque a season closeout price on  Wal-Mart's "Ozark Trails" version of
    this fan and bought seven of them for $4 each and am using those in two of
    my swamp cooler. They actually use less wattage than the Endless Breeze, but
    push slightly less air through, too.

    May have been four years ago I wrote here about Buckminster Fuller's proven
    "cooling effect," but have not yet heard of anyone experimenting with it on
    the playa with hexayurts.

    Fuller proved that putting a rain-capped stovepipe in the center of the roof
    of his circular dymation house or at the apex of the roof of a geodesic
    dome, and then having open vents about 1 foot above floor level around the
    walls of the building created an amazing, counter-intuitive cooling effect.
    The ratio of low-wall vent airflow capacity to roof vent was about 4 to 1,
    if I recall correctly.

    What happens -- and Fuller demonstrated this multiple times, including in a
    dome at the equator built for the U.S. military -- is that as the ground
    around the building and the walls of the building heat up as the sun beats
    down, this creates a flow of warm air rising around the outside of the
    building. That rising air creates suction at the floor level vents, pulling
    air out of the building. That causes a rush of air to be pulled down into
    the building through the roof vent.

    Fuller said this phenomenon extends for hundreds of feet into the air above
    the building. So you have hot air rising in a circle around the building and
    COOL air from higher in the atmosphere hundreds of feet above the building
    being sucked down the center of the invisible column.

    The cooling effect was commonly reported to be in the range of 20 degrees.
    That is, the air coming in through the root pipe and dropping on the room
    had an effect of cooling the room by about 20 degrees from its temperature
    with the vents all closed.

    Pretty amazing. Completely passive (other than opening and closing vents).
    And, other than the initial cost to build (the pvc or stove pipe and rain
    cap and dampers), free.

    I say that this is counter intuitive because normally we expect interior
    heat to rise and exit through a roof vent. And normally it does. And that
    certainly helps exhaust heat from the room or building. But it doesn't bring
    in a nice, steady, flow of cool air that drops on the room from the ceiling.

    Hope that helps inspire someone to experiment and report their results.

    Best,
    ken winston caine


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jack Senechal" <[email protected]>
    To: <[email protected]>
    Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 3:19 PM
    Subject: Re: [hexayurt] Windows


    I've used metal tape to fix a plexiglass panel to the outside, and it
    worked great. You could do two for better insulation, one inside and
    one out. And if you have two panels of plexiglass, you can bolt
    through them for extra solidity. But I think that might be overkill
    for the Playa. Having the cutout in there to block the sun during the
    part of the day when it shines in the window directly would probably
    be a good idea.

    Regarding ventilation, I suspect that it would work well to generate
    an updraft by installing a black chimney pipe in the roof. That would
    draw air up when the sun shines on it, pulling it in through your
    vents below.

    As an added bonus, you could put a damp cloth over the vent so air has
    to pass through it, which would cool it down and moisturize the air.
    You'd need a course fabric for that, something that's absorbent and
    loosely woven so air could pass through well. You could drape the
    bottom into a bucket of water, and it would wick it up continuously.

    I haven't actually tried those ventilation ideas to work out the kinks
    yet, but I intend to do that this year. The principles behind it are
    sound though :)

    Jack

    On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Milt Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I was planning to tape the filters to the outside after setting up. That
    > way
    > I could replace the cutouts during dust storms if too much dust came
    > through
    > the filters.
    > Did you just have one filter? Was that enough to provide ventilation?
    > On Jul 4, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Steve Upstill <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Don't know if you're headed for the Playa, but I liked my hyurt nice and
    > dark. I had great results with a furnace filter: cut a hole just small
    > enough to hold the filter firmly. Bonus: you can still fold/stack your
    > panels.
    > Cheers,
    > Steve
    > --
    > Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you
    > do
    > criticize him, you'll be a mile away and you'll have his shoes.
    >
    > On Jul 4, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Milt Fisher wrote:
    >>
    >> I'd like some recommendations for hexayurt windows. I'm not interested in
    >> framed, sliding windows with screens, just some plastic of some kind
    >> taped
    >> over a hole in the panel. Any recommendations on what kind of plastic to
    >> use? Thin plexiglas maybe? Or perhaps flexible vinyl?
    >
    >
    > Any other ideas for simple windows?
    > I'm planning to tape the plastic to the outside and hinge the panel cutout
    > into the window opening so we can close it when we want darkness.
    > Thanks,
    > Milt
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    > "hexayurt" group.
    > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    > [email protected].
    > For more options, visit this group at
    > http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.
    >
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    > "hexayurt" group.
    > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    > [email protected].
    > For more options, visit this group at
    > http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.
    >
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    > "hexayurt" group.
    > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    > [email protected].
    > For more options, visit this group at
    > http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.
    >

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
    "hexayurt" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected].
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hexayurt" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
    For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.





  -- 

  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hexayurt" group.
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
  For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.


  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hexayurt" group.
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
  For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hexayurt" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hexayurt" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hexayurt?hl=en.

Reply via email to