I have tried the "loaded gut" strings of Aquila (bourdon d on my symfonia,
1.80 mm equivalent, so at a low tension), but they proved to be very
breakable. Aquila stopped production and is preparing production of an
improved type (http://www.aquilacorde.com/catalogo8.htm). It may be a very
interesting, more authentic alternative for overspun bourdon strings,
although probably nobody can say if something like this type of string was
available in the 15th century.
Catline may be a good choice, but at this moment I use copper overspun nylon
strings (Aquila DE) on low tension, at least it sounds well.

The suggestion of Leonard Williams that it is more authentic to play at a
lower a (415 Hz or lower) does not apply to the 15th century, essentially
this belongs to the baroque era. In the 16th century you would expect  a
rather high a (485 for instance), but for practical reasons I would suggest
simply 440.

If your main repertoire is medieval, I would advise you to tune the
chanterelle one tone lower to c', keeping the bourdons in G, d and g. (Then
you will need something to fix the second key (for d') in pressing position
when tuning the strings.)  It may look awkward, but for a large part of the
medieval and renaissance repertoire, where dorian and mixolydian modes
prevail in tunes suitable for hurdy gurdy, it is really fine: when playing
with a d-drone one often has a c' as the lowest note of the melody, and with
a chanterelle in d' you would have to transpose the melody a fifth or an
octave.
If you change the chanterelle to c', the tangents must be retuned; see
http://hurdygurdywiki.wiki-site.com.

Ernic



2007/12/9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> From what I've read, overspun strings weren't used until the late 17thc.
> at earliest. Before that, lighter strings were twined together when you
> needed something really heavy.
>
> I've never heard what such strings sounded like, but they probably had
> their own problems....
>
> -Bill
>
>
> **************************************
> Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products.
> (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
>

Reply via email to