That's the wonderous benefit of building.

If you see a change that suits you, and the instrument will be for you, then 
make the change.  The position of the tangent when it hits the string is the 
important part, if you need to thin down slips to squeeze them in, to make 
funny bent sticks to accomodate the spacing, heck even create a 3rd row of 
holes for a few keyslips to get the notes you think you need to play, and you 
are comfortable you can play them where you put them, then grab a saw and a 
file and hack away.

Instruments evolve because people make subtle or not-so-subtle changes to the 
status quo.  If those changes are beneficial and workable, they often in short 
order become part of the new 'status quo'.  If they are a bad idea, they don't 
see the light of day for long.

I know that I was able to put 2 octaves in my sinphone, all the keys on the 
right 'layers'.  I had to use purpleheart for the slips at the top, because it 
is very strong and stable even when thin, but I squeezed them in there.  Just 
took some judicious filework, holding the tongue just right, and a few moments 
of prayers, but in the end, it worked out for me, and that is who I built the 
instrument for.

So be creative in finding solutions that satisfy your need as a player, if you 
are building.  After all, I am assuming that one of the reasons you are 
building is to create 'your' instrument.

Chris


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 4/22/2008 at 1:54 PM John Tappan wrote:
To All—

If this posts twice, please ignore one or the other.

In studying the keybox layout on the plans from Michel Pignol’s book, the F5 
key is located on the upper (accidental) row of keys.  I know that space is 
tight toward the wheel end of the keybox, and I’m guessing that it’s moved up 
for that reason.  I’m also guessing that’s why there’s no F5’ (F5#) key in 
sight—just not enough space to get it in.  I gather by reading this list that 
those really high notes may not be used all that often.

Is this a standard/traditional key arrangement, or something that Mssr Pignol 
just opted for?  It seems a bit “quirky,” but that would be in keeping with the 
character of the hurdy-gurdy itself—it’s all pretty quirky.

Some builders refer to a “full two octave” range, which should include that 
last accidental note.  Is it primarily a matter of narrowing the key blanks and 
making smaller holes to make room (assuming the tangent can still be adjusted 
properly)?  And even so, is it worth the effort to make those changes?

Thanks for responses in advance.


John T

Reply via email to