Not really. In general any token whose text is explicitly given in any of the grammars will be treated as a keyword. Generally speaking this is merely an oversight when someone alters the grammars. However, the definition of the OBJECT token actually hasn't changed since the SVN migration. The parameter rule (and its uses) however has changed much more recently... HHH-5126. This was a change you made Gail.
One of the major improvements in the next gen parser is the move to "soft keywords", where keywords are contextually recognized which essentially removes the concept of a "reserved word". We use that in a limited fashion in the current grammars. As for this particular report, do we have a simplified test? The Jira just lists the query. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> wrote: > As of 4.2.12, there are some identifiers that no longer work when used in > HQL/JPQL, e.g. [1]. > > Is there a list of reserved words somewhere? > > Thanks, > Gail > > [1] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9154 > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
