This appears to be due to the first commit for HHH-9100. I've re-opened https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9154 and added details there.
Steve, can you take a look? Thanks, Gail ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Ebersole" <st...@hibernate.org> > To: "Gail Badner" <gbad...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 1:58:02 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Reserved words > > Not really. In general any token whose text is explicitly given in any of > the grammars will be treated as a keyword. Generally speaking this is > merely an oversight when someone alters the grammars. However, the > definition of the OBJECT token actually hasn't changed since the SVN > migration. The parameter rule (and its uses) however has changed much more > recently... HHH-5126. This was a change you made Gail. > > One of the major improvements in the next gen parser is the move to "soft > keywords", where keywords are contextually recognized which essentially > removes the concept of a "reserved word". We use that in a limited fashion > in the current grammars. > > As for this particular report, do we have a simplified test? The Jira just > lists the query. > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > As of 4.2.12, there are some identifiers that no longer work when used in > > HQL/JPQL, e.g. [1]. > > > > Is there a list of reserved words somewhere? > > > > Thanks, > > Gail > > > > [1] https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9154 > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
