Let me know what y'all think -
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/wiki/Huge-Project,-Small-Team

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 7:37 AM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote:

> I think we generally agree and understand each other here.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:32 AM Imre Jonk via hibernate-dev <
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> This sounds a lot like how we do our version numbering as well. We try
>> to be as backward-compatible as possible with new "y" (minor) and
>> particularly the "z" (patch) releases, and try to put all the breaking
>> changes in the "x" (major) releases. But in the end, given a large
>> enough userbase, every (documented or undocumented) behavior of an API
>> is being relied upon by someone, meaning that every change will break
>> someone's workflow: https://xkcd.com/1172/
>
>
> Extrapolating what you say, we could never fix bugs because that buggy
> behavior is "being relied upon by someone".  I simply reject that.  Fairly
> sure that is not what you are saying, but this has been my point throughout
> this conversation - words are important.  Especially when you start talking
> about expectations across a large number of people.
>
>
> Depends on your definition of a "major version" ;)
>>
>
> Yep, we are back to words being important :D
>
> I've already documented here what we consider a major version and its
> implications; so you know my definition.
>
>
>
>> I meant that the Hibernate developers once in a while have to say to
>> each other "Let's stop backporting fixes for release series x.y. People
>> have had enough time to upgrade, now let's spend the time we save on
>> things in our roadmap".
>>
>
> Sure, but that's the thing.  That is reactive, not proactive.  Consider
> the current 5.x -> 6.x situation again... What most people who ask this
> stuff really want is, as soon as 6.0 is released, some date when 5.x will
> become unsupported.  But that is not something we are ever going to do - it
> is impossible.
>
>
> I now see the end-of-life warnings on the 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4 and 5.5
>> release pages! Did you just add those? They are great! I think this
>> gives a very clear signal to anyone still using those versions that
>> they are now quite overdue on their updates.
>>
>
> We discussed it and Yoann added that stuff.  Thanks Yoann!
>
>
> This has some overlap with human psychology. Someone should probably do
>> a study on this. They could start with looking at what happened when
>> Python 2's end-of-life date was finally announced... (you are probably
>> well aware, but if not: everyone was dragging their feet until the
>> announcement, which caused an enormous acceleration in the Python 3
>> transition).
>>
>
> Not a Python developer[1], so not really familiar with that specifically;
> but it is a common enough situation in software development.  It  also
> probably meant that Python 3 was not as thoroughly tested as it could have
> been prior to that accelerated migration.
>
> We are lucky in that we have a wonderful community, many of whom are very
> helpful in the early shake out of these new releases.  E.g., we had a lot
> of testing and feedback of 6.0 well before it went Final.
>
>
> > As you plan moving to 6.0, definitely check out the Jakarta
>> > Transformer to help automate some of the tedious Java Persistence to
>> > Jakarta Persistence move.
>>
>> Thanks! I'm passing this on to our developers.
>
>
> They can also use the transformer config files Christian wrote for our own
> migration efforts[2].
>
> [1] I had to develop in Jython for almost a year once and REFUSE to ever
> do anything Python related ever again ;)
> [2]
> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/tree/ff9e9eebc9992c7bc9128e9bf33d4b51b2bee7a4/rules
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list -- hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to hibernate-dev-le...@lists.jboss.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

Reply via email to