Yeah, I'm inclined to not commit this stuff. I might add it as a patch. But I'm not really very happy with how it turned out.
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Gavin King wrote:
I have an experimental (working) implementation of lazy componentsI agree with Joshua, I don't think lazy component is useful. components are not intend to be lazy but to be respectful with your OO approch.
in my sandbox. To be honest, I don't really like it very much. I can't
really support collections in lazy components without adding waaay
too much complexity, so I would have to put what seem like arbitrary
restrictions upon this functionality. And I just plain don't think that lazy
components are such a great idea in terms of performance. It would
be mostly a "marketing" feature and I don't like useless features bloating
the codebase.
Does anyone *really* want this feature?
I'd rather see a beautiful lazy profile API where you can choose what to load (property level) and lazy the rest, but that's an other story :)
-- Gavin King JBoss Group +61 410534454 http://hibernate.org
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
