I use oracle 10g for my testing and it is actually almost twice as slow against those drivers. The first version I wrote used arrays as opposed to lists, but I found the performance hit of using Lists minimal enough to warrant the easier programming model.
I still need to test this against 8i/9i, which is where people have been seeing this issue. I looked into the classes in the newer 10g jar and they seem to be handling this the correct way (in terms of caching the name-to-index resolution). I just do not currently have an install of either 8i or 9i to test against. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hibernate-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 9:45 AM > To: Hibernate development > Subject: [Hibernate] WRAP_RESULT_SETS > > Hi! > > Did someone try to compare the performance with and without the new > WRAP_RESULT_SETS feature ? > > -- > -- > Max Rydahl Andersen > callto://max.rydahl.andersen > > Hibernate > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hibernate.org > > JBoss Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://jboss.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
