OK, I ditched rule (2). Now they are completely orthogonal.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Bauer Sent: Thursday, 28 April 2005 3:16 PM To: <hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> <hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Hibernate] New laziness rules On Apr 28, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Gavin King wrote: > Only rule (2) is suspect. We don't need it, and I can get rid of it if > you guys like. I've added it because I think it might help reduce the > number of forum questions from people who wonder "why do I get lazy > fetching when fetch=join?". Not following the forums much, is that really a problem? > Note that the association-level lazy setting is now *completely > respected*. if I run a HQL query and some of the objects in the result > set have non-lazy associations, those associations will be > *immediately fetched*. Major change, has to be announced on homepage for 3.0.3 release. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
