On Tue, 03 May 2005 01:31:59 +0200, Gavin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yes, you're misunderstanding.
If I say lazy="false", it should *always* be eager fetched.
ok got it! Like it!
But we need to make it *very* clear in the release notes.
/max
There's nothing wrong with fetch="join" lazy="true" if you want
flexibility.
-----Original Message-----
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 5:48 PM
To: Gavin King; Christian Bauer; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] New laziness rules
Note that the association-level lazy setting is now *completely
respected*. if I run a HQL query and some of the objects in the
result
set have non-lazy associations, those associations will be
*immediately fetched*.
This one I don't get why we want that ?
I actually saw it as a strength that you via the HQL language could
override what the static mapping specified....or am i misunderstanding
this ?
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jboss.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
