Kalau kita tahu ahli keluarga kita bergaduh dengan tokey kedai/restaurant.. 
sure kita pun taknak makan kat kedai/restaurant .. begitulah juga bila kita 
tahu Amerika menjadi penyumbang senjata, pembela dan pelindung kepada Yahudi 
Zionis dan tenteranya, dah tentu kita pun rasa taknak dekat dengan apa jua yg 
berkaitan dengan Amerika.. mungkin kita nampak usaha kita kecil, boikot 
barangan Amerika tetapi boikot kecil beginilah yg disatukan diseluruh dunia 
telah melumpuhkan ekonomi Denmark ketika menyiarkan gambar2 penghinaan 
RasuluLlah, yg melumpuhkan kerajaan apartheid di Afrika Selatan dahulu.. tengok 
gambar saudara Palestine kita kena bunuh, kita sedih, marah tapi.. sebab sedap 
makan kita beri berbagai alasan taknak boikot.. tu la kita yang tak bersatu, 
takde roh Islam, takde rasa peri kemanusiaan.. senang je orang luar beli 
kita... macam berita kat bawah ni, bagaimana orang Islam diseksa atas 
pertuduhan 9/11.. yang menyeksa adalah juga orang Amerika
 yang menjadi jaguh hak asasi manusia..
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011303372_3.html?wpisrc=newsletter
 
Detainee Tortured, Says U.S. Official
Trial Overseer Cites 'Abusive' Methods Against 9/11 Suspect
 

As convening authority of military commissions, Susan Crawford is responsible 
for reviewing practices at Guantanamo Bay. (Courtesy Of Susan J. Crawford)
 
 
By Bob WoodwardWashington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 14, 2009; Page A01


 
The top Bush administration official in charge of deciding whether to bring 
Guantanamo Bay detainees to trial has concluded that the U.S. military tortured 
a Saudi national who allegedly planned to participate in the Sept. 11, 2001, 
attacks, interrogating him with techniques that included sustained isolation, 
sleep deprivation, nudity and prolonged exposure to cold, leaving him in a 
"life-threatening condition."

 
"We tortured [Mohammed al-]Qahtani," said Susan J. Crawford, in her first 
interview since being named convening authority of military commissions by 
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in February 2007. "His treatment met the 
legal definition of torture. And that's why I did not refer the case" for 
prosecution.
 
Crawford, a retired judge who served as general counsel for the Army during the 
Reagan administration and as Pentagon inspector general when Dick Cheney was 
secretary of defense, is the first senior Bush administration official 
responsible for reviewing practices at Guantanamo to publicly state that a 
detainee was tortured.
 
Crawford, 61, said the combination of the interrogation techniques, their 
duration and the impact on Qahtani's health led to her conclusion. "The 
techniques they used were all authorized, but the manner in which they applied 
them was overly aggressive and too persistent. . . . You think of torture, you 
think of some horrendous physical act done to an individual. This was not any 
one particular act; this was just a combination of things that had a medical 
impact on him, that hurt his health. It was abusive and uncalled for. And 
coercive. Clearly coercive. It was that medical impact that pushed me over the 
edge" to call it torture, she said.
 
Military prosecutors said in November that they would seek to refile charges 
against Qahtani, 30, based on subsequent interrogations that did not employ 
harsh techniques. But Crawford, who dismissed war crimes charges against him in 
May 2008, said in the interview that she would not allow the prosecution to go 
forward.
 
Qahtani was denied entry into the United States a month before the Sept. 11 
attacks and was allegedly planning to be the plot's 20th hijacker. He was later 
captured in Afghanistan and transported to Guantanamo in January 2002. His 
interrogation took place over 50 days from November 2002 to January 2003, 
though he was held in isolation until April 2003.
 
"For 160 days his only contact was with the interrogators," said Crawford, who 
personally reviewed Qahtani's interrogation records and other military 
documents. "Forty-eight of 54 consecutive days of 18-to-20-hour interrogations. 
Standing naked in front of a female agent. Subject to strip searches. And 
insults to his mother and sister."
 
At one point he was threatened with a military working dog named Zeus, 
according to a military report. Qahtani "was forced to wear a woman's bra and 
had a thong placed on his head during the course of his interrogation" and "was 
told that his mother and sister were whores." With a leash tied to his chains, 
he was led around the room "and forced to perform a series of dog tricks," the 
report shows.
 
The interrogation, portions of which have been previously described by other 
news organizations, including The Washington Post, was so intense that Qahtani 
had to be hospitalized twice at Guantanamo with bradycardia, a condition in 
which the heart rate falls below 60 beats a minute and which in extreme cases 
can lead to heart failure and death. At one point Qahtani's heart rate dropped 
to 35 beats per minute, the record shows.
 
The Qahtani case underscores the challenges facing the incoming Obama 
administration as it seeks to close the controversial detention facility at 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including the dilemmas posed by individuals considered 
too dangerous to release but whose legal status is uncertain. FBI "clean 
teams," which gather evidence without using information gained during 
controversial interrogations, have established that Qahtani intended to join 
the 2001 hijackers. Mohamed Atta, the plot's leader, who died steering American 
Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Center, went to the Orlando airport to 
meet Qahtani on Aug. 4, 2001, but the young Saudi was denied entry by a 
suspicious immigration inspector.
 
"There's no doubt in my mind he would've been on one of those planes had he 
gained access to the country in August 2001," Crawford said of Qahtani, who 
remains detained at Guantanamo. "He's a muscle hijacker. . . . He's a very 
dangerous man. What do you do with him now if you don't charge him and try him? 
I would be hesitant to say, 'Let him go.' "
 
That, she said, is a decision that President-elect Barack Obama will have to 
make. Obama repeated Sunday that he intends to close the Guantanamo center but 
acknowledged the challenges involved. "It is more difficult than I think a lot 
of people realize," Obama said on ABC's "This Week," "and we are going to get 
it done, but part of the challenge that you have is that you have a bunch of 
folks that have been detained, many of whom may be very dangerous, who have not 
been put on trial or have not gone through some adjudication. And some of the 
evidence against them may be tainted, even though it's true."
 
President Bush and Vice President Cheney have said that interrogations never 
involved torture. "The United States does not torture. It's against our laws, 
and it's against our values," Bush asserted on Sept. 6, 2006, when 14 
high-value detainees were transferred to Guantanamo from secret CIA prisons. 
And in a interview last week with the Weekly Standard, Cheney said, "And I 
think on the left wing of the Democratic Party, there are some people who 
believe that we really tortured."

 
"I sympathize with the intelligence gatherers in those days after 9/11, not 
knowing what was coming next and trying to gain information to keep us safe," 
said Crawford, a lifelong Republican. "But there still has to be a line that we 
should not cross. And unfortunately what this has done, I think, has tainted 
everything going forward."
 
"The Department has always taken allegations of abuse seriously," Pentagon 
spokesman Geoff Morrell said in an e-mail. "We have conducted more than a dozen 
investigations and reviews of our detention operations, including specifically 
the interrogation of Mohammed Al Qahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker. They 
concluded the interrogation methods used at GTMO, including the special 
techniques used on Qahtani in 2002, were lawful. However, subsequent to those 
reviews, the Department adopted new and more restrictive policies and 
procedures for interrogation and detention operations. Some of the aggressive 
questioning techniques used on Al Qahtani, although permissible at the time, 
are no longer allowed in the updated Army field manual."
 
After the Supreme Court ruled in the 2006 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case that the 
original military commission system for Guantanamo Bay violated the 
Constitution and the Geneva Conventions, Congress rewrote the rules and passed 
the Military Commissions Act, creating a new structure for trials by 
commissions. The act bans torture but permits "coercive" testimony.
 
Crawford said she believes that coerced testimony should not be allowed. "You 
don't allow it in a regular court," said Crawford, who served as a judge of the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces from 1991 to 2006.
 
Under the act, Crawford is a neutral official overseeing charges, trials and 
sentencing, with ultimate decision-making power over all cases coming before 
the military commissions.
 
In May 2008, Crawford ordered the war-crimes charges against Qahtani dropped 
but did not state publicly that the harsh interrogations were the reason. "It 
did shock me," Crawford said. "I was upset by it. I was embarrassed by it. If 
we tolerate this and allow it, then how can we object when our servicemen and 
women, or others in foreign service, are captured and subjected to the same 
techniques? How can we complain? Where is our moral authority to complain? 
Well, we may have lost it."
 
The harsh techniques used against Qahtani, she said, were approved by 
then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. "A lot of this happened on his 
watch," she said. Last month, a Senate Armed Services Committee report 
concluded that "Rumsfeld's authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques 
for use at Guantanamo Bay was a direct cause of detainee abuse there." The 
committee found the interrogation techniques harsh and abusive but stopped 
short of calling them torture.
 
An aide to the former defense secretary accused the committee chairman,  Carl 
M. Levin (D-Mich.), of pursuing a politically motivated "false narrative" that 
is "unencumbered by the preponderance of the facts."
 
In June 2005, Time magazine obtained 83 pages of Qahtani's interrogation log 
and published excerpts that showed some of the extreme abuse. The report of a 
military investigation released the same year concluded that Qahtani's 
interrogations were "degrading and abusive."
 
Crawford said she does not know whether five other detainees accused of 
participating in the Sept. 11 plot, including alleged mastermind Khalid Sheik 
Mohammed, were tortured.
 
"I assume torture," she said, noting that CIA Director Michael V. Hayden has 
said publicly that Mohammed was one of three detainees waterboarded by the CIA. 
Crawford declined to say whether she considers waterboarding, a technique that 
simulates drowning, to be torture.
 
The five detainees face capital murder charges, and Crawford said she let the 
charges go forward because the FBI satisfied her that they gathered information 
without using harsh techniques. She noted that Mohammed has acknowledged his 
Sept. 11 role in court, whereas Qahtani has recanted his self-incriminating 
statements to the FBI.
 
"There is no doubt he was tortured," Gitanjali S. Gutierrez, Qahtani's civilian 
attorney, said this week. "He has loss of concentration and memory loss, and he 
suffers from paranoia. . . . He wants just to get back to Saudi Arabia, get 
married and have a family."
She said Qahtani "adamantly denies he planned to join the 9/11 attack. . . . He 
has no connections to extremists." Gutierrez said she believes Saudi Arabia has 
an effective rehabilitation program and Qahtani ought to be returned there.

 
When she came in as convening authority in 2007, Crawford said, "the 
prosecution was unprepared" to bring cases to trial. Even after four years 
working possible cases, "they were lacking in experience and judgment and 
leadership," she said. "A prosecutor has an ethical obligation to review all 
the evidence before making a charging decision. And they didn't have access to 
all the evidence, including medical records, interrogation logs, and they were 
making charging decisions without looking at everything."
 
She noted that prosecutors are required to determine whether any evidence 
possessed by the government could be exculpatory; if it is, they must turn it 
over to defense lawyers. It took more than a year, she said -- and the 
intervention of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England -- to ensure they had 
access to all the information, much of it classified.
 
Crawford said detainee interrogation practices are a blot on the reputation of 
the United States and its military judicial system. "There's an assumption out 
there that everybody was tortured. And everybody wasn't tortured. But 
unfortunately perception is reality." The system she oversees probably can't 
function now, she said. "Certainly in the public's mind, or politically 
speaking, and certainly in the international community" it may be forever 
tainted. "It may be too late."
 
She said Bush was right to create a system to try unlawful enemy combatants 
captured in the war on terrorism. The implementation, however, was flawed, she 
said. "I think he hurt his own effort. . . . I think someone should acknowledge 
that mistakes were made and that they hurt the effort and take responsibility 
for it."
 
"We learn as children it's easier to ask for forgiveness than it is for 
permission," Crawford said. "I think the buck stops in the Oval Office."
 
Researchers Julie Tate and Evelyn Duffy contributed to this report.


      Yahoo! Toolbar is now powered with Search Assist.Download it now!
http://sg.toolbar.yahoo.com/

Kirim email ke