On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:10:41PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> message: >> ...and the missing header addition > > Note that Bazaar support uncommit quite nicely, so I think it's better > to use uncommit to fix such commits. You can just uncommit and then > recommit a fixed version instead of adding a new revision to fix the > previous one. In this way, you avoid having a broken and non-compiling > revision in between.
Good point, although I don't like altering the history too much. It will always lead to confusion in case someone checked out the uncommitted commit in between. Nevertheless, I think for a project of our size and especially on an individual branch, this "history issue" should be of no concern. Cheers, René -- Dipl.-Inform. Rene Hummen, Ph.D. Student Distributed Systems Group RWTH Aachen University, Germany tel: +49 241 80 20772 web: http://ds.rwth-aachen.de/members/hummen _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hipl-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hipl-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
