On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:48:53PM +0200, René Hummen wrote: > On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:10:41PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > >> message: > >> ...and the missing header addition > > > > Note that Bazaar support uncommit quite nicely, so I think it's better > > to use uncommit to fix such commits. You can just uncommit and then > > recommit a fixed version instead of adding a new revision to fix the > > previous one. In this way, you avoid having a broken and non-compiling > > revision in between. > > Good point, although I don't like altering the history too much. > It will always lead to confusion in case someone checked out the > uncommitted commit in between. Nevertheless, I think for a project of > our size and especially on an individual branch, this "history issue" > should be of no concern.
This should hardly be a problem if you recommit quickly. We hardly average a handful of commits a week. And you are right, if you are working on a branch alone, there is no possibility for conflicts. Also, the history will be cleaner if you decide to merge to trunk. Diego _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hipl-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hipl-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
