> Ard Schrijvers wrote: > > Indeed but looking at the format from "1217340166960" I > have no clue > > what format I am looking at :-) > > > > Where did you get it from?? > > My guess would be seconds since epoch (excluding leap > seconds), the standard unix way of encoding time.
Was already thinking it was something like that....now, all you need to know is the format which corresponds to this number....there probably is one. The is the src-pattern Ard > > '1217340166' corresponds with 'Tue Jul 29 16:02:46 CEST 2008' > which would be quite a coincidence if that's a made up number... > > I'm not sure where the postfixed 960 comes from, but then > again, maybe that's why the conversion fails? If it's > milliseconds (which I've never heard of in conjunction with > 'time since epoch'), try dividing it by a thousand first. > > Regards, > Bartosz > > ******************************************** > Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist > > Searchable archives can be found at: > MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org > Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html > > ******************************************** Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist Searchable archives can be found at: MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html
