Hi Folks,

I've determined a distinction regarding the clustering topic.  It
appears that the clustering works fine with the repo built as a
standalone binary, but not when it is built is a WAR distribution.  I'm
using version 1.2.13 of the Repo.

I did some poking around on Google regarding JGroups in conjunction with
Tomcat, but I haven't zeroed in on anything yet.  Are there any known
issues regarding the WAR variant of the Repo and JGroups?

TIA,

-Eugene


Eugene Fabrikant wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> I apologize for the poor writing, it was very late at night here! 
> Essentially the clustering function worked only on one event, the add of
> the document.  Any subsequent changes to the first node were NOT relayed
> to the second node.  Even this behavior does not happen consistently. 
> Sometimes even the first event does not get relayed to the second node.
>
> So it would seem that the configuration is valid if it worked at all. 
> Just to provide a little more detail, I'm trying this with two Tomcat
> 6.x instances that are themselves clustered and then configuring JGroups
> to attach to the same IP but different ports.  I've also tried
> configuring the two nodes to bind to separate interfaces and all
> attempts produced the same results.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Eugene
>
>
> Ard Schrijvers wrote:
>   
>> Aaah good point Nick....reading it again I read something else than I
>> did the first, though I must admit I thought I understood the issue the
>> first time, but now I have lost it:
>>
>> 'Subsequent modifications to the repo go unannounced to the second node'
>>
>> So, they go to the second node or not but unannounced? Or they are
>> unannounced, and don't go to the second node at all?? I am lost..
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> I think the problem is in the last line:
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Subsequent modifications to the repo go unannounced to the second 
>>>> node.
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> With regards,
>>>
>>> Nick Stolwijk
>>> ~Java Developer~
>>>
>>> Iprofs BV.
>>> Claus Sluterweg 125
>>> 2012 WS Haarlem
>>> www.iprofs.nl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Ard Schrijvers 
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Hello Eugene
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting a strange behavior after enabling the jgroups repo 
>>>>> clustering.  I see that both nodes "find" each other in the slide 
>>>>> log.
>>>>> I then setup two tomcat instances (war builds), I add a 
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>> document to 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>>> one node and the second node gets the update.
>>>>> Subsequent modifications to the repo go unannounced to the second 
>>>>> node.
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> Hmmm, I think I do not understand the problem...i suppose 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> if you add a 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> document to the first node, this node gets the new document 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> also, right?
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> So, but what is wrong in your opinion that the second node 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> also gets 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> the update? What do you expect from clustering? How it 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> normally works, 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> is that clustered repositories all write to the same 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> database, and the 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> notifications are send around just to invalidate the caches of the 
>>>> other repo instances, such that, on a request, they 
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> re-fetch the node 
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> from the database.
>>>>
>>>> Aren't you confusing clustering with distributed storage?
>>>>
>>>> Ard
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> I've definitely seen repo clustering working consistently at one 
>>>>> point.
>>>>> Does this sound like anything obvious or familiar to anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> TIA for any help!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Eugene Fabrikant
>>>>> Bluenog Corporation
>>>>>
>>>>> bluenogef (Y!IM, AIM)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ********************************************
>>>>> Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist
>>>>>
>>>>> Searchable archives can be found at:
>>>>> MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org
>>>>> Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> ********************************************
>>>> Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist
>>>>
>>>> Searchable archives can be found at:
>>>> MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org
>>>> Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> ********************************************
>>> Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist
>>>
>>> Searchable archives can be found at:
>>> MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org
>>> Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> ********************************************
>> Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist
>>
>> Searchable archives can be found at:
>> MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org
>> Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Eugene Fabrikant
Bluenog Corporation

bluenogef (Y!IM, AIM)



********************************************
Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist

Searchable archives can be found at:
MarkMail: http://hippocms-dev.markmail.org
Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Hippo-CMS-f26633.html

Reply via email to