SDL is simpler in context to XML. Although, I am still in favor of a
scripting language; I have done my experimentation and I am convinced a
scripting language is a much better fit considering configurations.
Between SDL and XML, I don't see much of a difference as such, but when
considering tool support, XML would probably win.
Harish Krishnaswamy: +0 (binding)
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
All this divisive talk about SDL vs. XML (vs. ???) is getting to be a
distraction from what HiveMind is all about. I think people are very
correct with the idea that the important thing is to minimize the
*amount* of content in the XML, regardless of the expression of that
content. That's where we should be concentrating ... and I have a few
ideas along that line.
Anyway, a +1 vote indicates that you feel SDL should be stripped out
of HiveMind (as a failed experment). I'm cool with that, as long as
people piitch in to convert the many SDL into XML.
Howard Lewis Ship: -0 (binding)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
