All this divisive talk about SDL vs. XML (vs. ???) is getting to be a distraction from what HiveMind is all about. I think people are very correct with the idea that the important thing is to minimize the *amount* of content in the XML, regardless of the expression of that content. That's where we should be concentrating ... and I have a few ideas along that line.
Anyway, a +1 vote indicates that you feel SDL should be stripped out of HiveMind (as a failed experment). I'm cool with that, as long as people piitch in to convert the many SDL into XML. Howard Lewis Ship: -0 (binding) Knut Wannheden: +0 (binding) Harish Krishnaswamy: +0 (binding) Erik Hatcher: +1 (binding) robertj: -1 (non-binding) Achim Huegen: +1 (not binding) Pablo Lalloni: -1 (non-binidng) Marcus Brito: +1 (non-binding) James Carman: +1 (non-binding) Naresh Sikha: +1 (non-binding) OK .. for consensus approval, we need 3 binding +1's and no vetos. It's a pretty wild mix, actually ... but it appears that the developers are leaning towards removal of SDL and the larger community is more emphatic (both ways, but more towards removal). -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
