Sorry for that! I tried to figure out the rules of this game but didn't get
a clue. So I made a blind attempt.
Hope you don't mind.
Matthias

-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Montag, 2. August 2004 19:17
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Discard SDL?


Good comments Mathias, but if memory serves, you aren't a HiveMind
committer, so your vote is not binding.  Sorry!  The (bindng) vs.
(non-binding) bit helps me when I compile and publish the results of the
vote.

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:50:41 +0200 , Burbach, Matthias
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm strongly in favour of discarding SDL. We already converted SDL 
> files in our project to XML because of the better tool support for 
> XML. And I think it's a pity if you spend your valuable time on 
> writing SDL parsers, documenting SDL syntax, fixing bugs related to 
> it, and so on and so forth. Also, I don't feel SDL is much leaner than 
> the XML equivalent. So, please use your great capabilities to advance 
> Hivemind in more important areas!
> 
> Matthias Burbach: +1 (binding)
> 
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Harish Krishnaswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 2. August 2004 17:24
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Discard SDL?
> 
> SDL is simpler in context to XML. Although, I am still in favor of a 
> scripting language; I have done my experimentation and I am convinced 
> a scripting language is a much better fit considering configurations. 
> Between SDL and XML, I don't see much of a difference as such, but 
> when considering tool support, XML would probably win.
> 
> Harish Krishnaswamy: +0 (binding)
> 
> Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> 
> >All this divisive talk about SDL vs. XML (vs. ???) is getting to be a 
> >distraction from what HiveMind is all about. I think people are very 
> >correct with the idea that the important thing is to minimize the
> >*amount* of content in the XML, regardless of the expression of that 
> >content. That's where we should be concentrating ... and I have a few 
> >ideas along that line.
> >
> >Anyway, a +1 vote indicates that you feel SDL should be stripped out 
> >of HiveMind (as a failed experment).  I'm cool with that, as long as 
> >people piitch in to convert the many SDL into XML.
> >
> >Howard Lewis Ship: -0 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to