The ordering logic should already be sufficiently tested by the TestOrderer test. I suppose you'll only have to test that the name attribute properly overrides the service-id attribute.
--knut On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:18:37 -0500, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just found that! Thanks. It took a bit of digging, but I found it. Also, > does anyone know of a test case that tests the ordering logic for > interceptors? I need to put in a specific test case for when the name is > overridden. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Knut Wannheden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 9:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AOPAlliance Service Interceptors... > > James, > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:53:01 -0500, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I am already implementing it by adding a "name" attribute to > > ServiceInterceptorContribution (and its impl class and the code that > builds > > it)... > > > > I'm not sure if you've found out already (as it's not all that > obvious), but to extend the syntax you have to edit > DescriptorParser.properties. > > --knut > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
