Well, I've got it implemented with test cases, but I can't get Eclipse to
generate a patch for me!  It sees my new classes, but fails to include the
changes I have made to existing classes/interfaces.  HELP!

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 10:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AOPAlliance Service Interceptors...

This works for me.  Having the name default to the service id is a
perfectly fine idea.


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:35:50 -0500, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> Has anyone else come up with a way to do this cleanly?  I think one big
step
> in the right direction would be support for overriding the interceptor's
> name, replacing the factory's id with something else.  This way, we could
> define ONE service interceptor factory which inserts a MethodInterceptor
> defined elsewhere in the registry (or inline maybe) and the interceptors
> could still be ordered, since they could have unique names.  We could
leave
> it backward compatible, of course, defaulting the interceptor name to the
> service id of the interceptor factory. 
> 
>   
> 
> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
> name="security"> 
> 
>   <impl object="service:mymodule.SecurityInterceptor"; /> 
> 
> </interceptor> 
> 
>   
> 
> <interceptor service-id="hivemind.lib.MethodInterceptorFactory"
> name="logging" before="security"> 
> 
>   <impl
object="instance:com.myco.myproject.interceptor.LoggingInterceptor"
> /> 
> 
> </interceptor> 
> 
>   
> 
> Here, we have defined a service interceptor using another service and one
> using just a plain ole object.  What do you guys think? 
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 7:35 AM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: AOPAlliance Service Interceptors...
>  
> 
>   
> 
> --> 
>  
> 
> Hello, All.  Since the AOPAlliance Service Interceptors support didn't
make
> it into 1.1, when can we expect that to become available?  I would like to
> discuss service interceptors in my article, but there is NO WAY that I'm
> going to try to explain how to do it using Javassist.  I would like to use
> the AOPAlliance stuff. 
> 
>   
> 
> James 


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to