I see that you have Microsoft on the brain.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:01:44 -0400

>I was unaware closed source stood for anything.  Since open source is
>free, as in speech, it 'stands for something' just by its nature.  What
>does closed source stand for?  Superfluous amounts of patent
>litigation?  Immoral software licenses?  Moronic support contracts?
>Charging customers for bug fixes?  Massive security flaws and cascading
>software failures?  The ever misleading 'warranty'.  None of these
>things have to do with Valve of course but they are just things that
>came to my head when I thought about some of the biggest proponents of
>closed source.
>
>On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 20:21, Philip wrote:
>> On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 08:55  pm, Manip wrote:
>>
>> > you don't seem to understand anything about
>> > what open source is and what it stands for.
>>
>> And you don't seem to understand anything about what closed source is
>> and what it stands for.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to