So you are admitting the PINE is a weaker email client solution since it does not provide a lot of functionality many are used to. Functionality that exists to deliver rich text, web content.
----- Original Message ----- From: "tei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:57 AM Subject: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: [hlcoders] (no subject) > > <off-topic> > > Jakob W. Nielsen wrote: > > That's because, if people are to write a virus they want to target as > > many as possible, so if everyone switches to netscapes browser and > > client, that'll be the target. If everyone switches to Linux that'll be > > the target. > > Contra-example: > > APACHE its the most installed webserver, but its not the most attacked, > that is IIS because this last is poorly coded. > > > > > > But you! Are probably relatively safe in anycase. Pine is not going to > > be the peoples choice any time soon ;) > > Oh.. maybe Its because pine dont support scripting, include Active-X > object, need Admin (root) rights to work and have tons of weak defaults. > > </off-topic> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
