If you had to write a support email with embedded screenshots, then a "clickable" email client would be superior to pine.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Ackermann Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: [hlcoders] (no subject) Am Mo 02.08.2004 16:18, Shane Robinett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > So you are admitting the PINE is a weaker email client solution since it > does not provide a lot of functionality many are used to. Functionality that > exists to deliver rich text, web content. Funny, that this seems to be a topic for hlcoders as well ;-) PINE, elm and - of cource - mutt, are of course the more powerful email clients! They just do not contain things an email client realy does not need to have ;-) But with email, they are so much stronger than any clickable solution i ever saw ... For "web content", i can send a link to it or an archive as attachment, for "rich text", i ... uhhh ... realy see no application and, to be honest, dont understand for what it is :-) If you want fonts and colors and also realy WANT RTF, just use an editor that can handle this - your email client has nothing to do with the editor you are using to write ... _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
