-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I use 3.4.1 since that's what was recommended. Since I'm only doing plugins, I compiled GCC to cross compile from cygwin so I don't have to mess with rebooting in Linux all the time.
On 3/20/07, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you sure? > > $ strings ./srcds_i686 | grep GNU > GCC: (GNU) 3.2.3 > GCC: (GNU) 3.4.1 > GNU AS 2.14.90.0.2 > GNU C 3.2.3 > GNU C++ 3.4.1 > GNU C 3.4.1 > > (Duplicate lines removed. Basically same output for srcds_i486 and > bin/tier0_s_i486.so.) > > Maybe you should check with the people responsible for the build... > unless you're the one and something slipped your attention. In any case, > thanks for unknowingly going with the newer ABI. ;-) Now let's hope GNU > doesn't "revolutionize" it with 4.2 and 4.3... > > Any serious mod/plugin makers with Linux binaries here: which GCC/G++ > version do you use? > > ~~ Ondra > > Alfred Reynolds wrote: > > We are using GCC 3.3 and have no upgrade plans at the moment (upgrading > would break all existing mods so it would be a rare event if it ever > happens). > > > > - Alfred > > > > Ondrej Hošek wrote: > > > >> (Transplanted from [hlds_linux]...) > >> > >> Actually, GCC 3.4 and 4.x have the same ABI. The big change happened > >> 3.3 -> 3.4. I don't know what Valve compiled their current engine > >> versions > >> with (please tell), but is there a plan to move to one of these > >> versions (3.4, 4.0, 4.1)? What would the timeframe be? > >> > >> You may wish to read about the ABIs at > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/abi.html. It's the major > >> version (first number) of libstdc++.so that matters. Since GCC 3.4 > >> (versions of > >> 4.2 and 4.3 are not known yet), they're at major 6. > >> > >> Oh... and here's a tip: DON'T add "-Wall -Werror -pedantic" to and > >> remove "-fpermissive" from the CCFLAGS. g++ will hate you. ;-) > >> > >> ~~ Ondra > >> > >> Alfred Reynolds wrote: > >> > >>> This question is better asked on the hlcoders list (subscribe via > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com). The reason you need to do it is > >>> because the Source engine is compiled with GCC 3.x and GCC 4.x > >>> binaries aren't binary compatible for the C++ ABI. > >>> > >>> - Alfred > >>> > >>> Dave Dodd wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Can someone either point me towards discussion of why the linux_sdk > >>>> need to be compiled under GCC 3.?.? I am trying to resolve a > >>>> problem with my Battlegrounds 2 server and I don't want to downgrade > >>>> my compiler from 4.1.1 . I was able to compile a server under 4.1.1 > >>>> by simply tweaking two source files lightglow.cpp & mathlib.cpp > >>>> > >>>> Anyone ? > >>>> > >>>> -- Dave > >>>> > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
