Hello,

so we have to wait on OrangeBox and Port the plugin to get this problem
fixed? Or
is there the same problem right now?

Is there a date for the OrangeBox SDK?
Will it be a new SDK or gets the Source SDK Updated?

Can you send us a "example", what we have to change to get Orange Box
compatible?

And after the Orange Box is released and CS:S is Portet, will CS:S stay on
the old Source
Engine or get this old Engine deleted?

Thanks!

With friendly Reguards

Ratman2000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Durand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:33 PM
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Engine Plugin Interface Problems


> We've found the root cause of the problem, but with the release of
> Orange Box haven't had a chance to implement a solution yet.
>
> -Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Paloma
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Engine Plugin Interface Problems
>
> Mike Durand has told me at least twice that he would look into this. At
> one
> point, I believe somebody at Valve said they may have found the issue. I
> have not heard anything about it since.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [hlcoders] Engine Plugin Interface Problems
>
> Hello,
>
> i have a big Problem...
>
> I need to unload my Plugin and load it again.
> After i have unloaded the plugin i delete the *.so file and
> copy a new version to this position...
>
> But when i than load the plugin again (without restart the server)
> the old plugin version gets loaded so i think, that the plugin get
> loaded
> from memmory...
>
> Is there any way, to delete all content like cvars and other by
> unloading
> the plugin so i can load a newer version without restart the server?
>
> Thanks
>
> With friendly reguards
>
> Ratman2000
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratman2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Error in Query Protocoll ???
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > yes the select supports UDP Sockets... becouse it uses the descriptors
> to
> > read the state.
> >
> > How can i check the 4 Bytes?
> >
> > My problem is, that i dont get 2 Packets, so the first packet i have
> > recieved isnt ok and
> > there are nothing following...
> >
> > You know what i am meaning?
> >
> > With friendly Reguards
> >
> > Ratman2000
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ronny Schedel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:24 AM
> > Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Error in Query Protocoll ???
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > check the first 4 Bytes response
> > >
> > > FF FF FF FF means: only one packet is send
> > > FE FF FF FF means: it is a multipacket response
> > >
> > > Use the packet ID to sort the packets and to check which packets are
> > > missing.
> > >
> > > To understand what you got, save every packet to a new file and take
> a
> > look
> > > with a hex editor/viewer.
> > >
> > > Check the select() documentation to figure out if it really support
> UDP
> > > sockets or not, as far as I remember it does not, but I could be
> wrong.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Ronny Schedel
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > i have tested this and have tested to recieve another packet but i
> dont
> > > get
> > > > any...
> > > >
> > > > My code after i have connected i send the request and recieve it
> with
> > this
> > > > function:
> > > >
> > > >    FD_ZERO( &amp;ReadSet );
> > > >    FD_SET( Socket, &amp;ReadSet );
> > > >    timeVal.tv_sec = 1;
> > > >    timeVal.tv_usec = 0;
> > > >
> > > >    for ( int i = 1; i &lt;= 3; i++ )
> > > >    {
> > > >     if ( select( Socket+1, &amp;ReadSet, NULL, NULL, &amp;timeVal
> ) ==
> > 1 )
> > > >     {
> > > >      if ( FD_ISSET( Socket, &amp;ReadSet ) )
> > > >      {
> > > >       bytes = recv( Socket, buffer, sizeof( buffer ) - 1, 0 );
> > > >       buffer[ bytes ] = '';
> > > >
> > > >       if ( bytes == SOCKET_ERROR || bytes == 0 )
> > > >       {
> > > >        printf( &quot;    Server offlinen&quot; );
> > > >
> > > >        return;
> > > >       }
> > > >       else if ( buffer[ 4 ] != S2A_RULES )
> > > >       {
> > > >        printf( &quot;     Error by recieving Rules!n&quot; );
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       printf( &quot;     NumRulez: %in&quot;,
> *(short*)&amp;buffer[5] );
> > > >      }
> > > >     }
> > > >     else
> > > >     {
> > > >      Retrys--;
> > > >      printf( &quot;No answer...n&quot; );
> > > >     }
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > > In this test i run 3 times to check for 3 packets (as test)...
> > > > So in my test i have to recieve 2 packets by the servers that send
> me
> > the
> > > > errors!
> > > >
> > > > But i recieve:
> > > >
> > > > Connected: 195.210.58.104:27015
> > > >      NumRulez: 64
> > > > No answer...
> > > > No answer...
> > > > Connected: 85.131.173.50:26000
> > > >      NumRulez: 64
> > > > No answer...
> > > > No answer...
> > > > Connected: 82.96.106.43:27100
> > > >      NumRulez: 64
> > > > No answer...
> > > > No answer...
> > > > Connected: 84.200.252.37:27025
> > > >      Error by recieving Rules!
> > > >      NumRulez: 21880
> > > > No answer...
> > > > No answer...
> > > >
> > > > So you can see, the first 3 Servers responsed with 64 Cvars whats
> right
> > > and
> > > > i can scan it with no problems...
> > > >
> > > > But the last server returns with an error how i have sayed in my
> first
> > > > mail..
> > > > But the other 2 checks to show the other packts returns no answer,
> so
> > > there
> > > > no other packets...
> > > >
> > > > So the first packet has to be the packet with all infos, but i
> cant
> > > recieve
> > > > it right?
> > > >
> > > > Can anybody tell me, whats wrong with it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > (sorry for my bad english!)
> > > >
> > > > With friendly Reguards from Germany
> > > >
> > > > Ratman2000
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: &quot;Ronny Schedel&quot; &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;
> > > > To: &lt;[email protected]&gt;
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 6:05 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Error in Query Protocoll ???
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > &gt; Hello,
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt; first, the packet size is 1400 as far as I remember. Second,
> you
> > have
> > > to
> > > > &gt; deal with multi-packets:
> http://dev.kquery.com/index.php?article=21
> > > > &gt; This will happens mostly with the rules request, because it
> does
> > not
> > > fit
> > > > &gt; into one packet. Remember, UDP packets can be received in
> wrong
> > > order. Try
> > > > &gt; to handle this all and it will fix your problem.
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt; Best regards
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt; Ronny Schedel
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; Hello,
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; is there an error in the Query Protocolo?
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; I call from an application the Server Protocol on many
> > different
> > > > &gt; &gt; servers and all wors fine.. But on few servers i am not
> able
> > to
> > > recieve
> > > > &gt; &gt; the
> > > > &gt; &gt; Rulez but HLSW i have seen works fine!
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; I Tested with this Servers:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; Connected: 85.131.163.208:27055
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 64
> > > > &gt; &gt; Connected: 89.106.68.188:27016
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 74
> > > > &gt; &gt; Connected: 85.14.229.244:27015
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 64
> > > > &gt; &gt; Connected: 85.14.225.123:27015
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 67
> > > > &gt; &gt; Connected: 195.4.107.178:27015
> > > > &gt; &gt;     Error on recieving Rules!
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 2
> > > > &gt; &gt;     Error on recieving Rules!
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 2
> > > > &gt; &gt;     Error on recieving Rules!
> > > > &gt; &gt;     NumRulez: 2
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; So you can see, on Server 195.4.107.178:27015 i am not
> able
> to
> > > recieve
> > > > the
> > > > &gt; &gt; Rules right like the other servers...
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; I Request the rules on this way:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; After i am connectet i send:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; strcpy( Befehl, &quot;xFFxFFxFFxFFx56&quot; );
> > > > &gt; &gt; strcat( Befehl, GetServerChallange() );
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; bytes = send( Socket, Befehl, strlen( Befehl ), 0 );
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; GetServerChallange returns the Server Challange and that
> works
> > > fine
> > > > &gt; &gt; becouse
> > > > &gt; &gt; i am able to retrieve from all other serves
> > > > &gt; &gt; the rules...
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; Than:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; bytes = recv( Socket, buffer, sizeof( buffer ) - 1, 0 );
> > > > &gt; &gt; buffer[ bytes ] = '';
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; buffer is declared as char buffer[1024];
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; After that i check for errors like:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; if ( buffer[ 4 ] != S2A_RULES )
> > > > &gt; &gt; {
> > > > &gt; &gt;     printf( &quot;     Error on recieving Rules!n&quot;
> );
> > > > &gt; &gt; }
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; S2A_RULES is defined as:
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; #define S2A_RULES 0x45
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; So i check that is the right response.
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; But on many servers i get the error but i dont know why!
> Can
> > > anybody
> > > > help
> > > > &gt; &gt; me
> > > > &gt; &gt; to fix this problem?
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; With friendly Reguards
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; Ratman2000
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
> > > > &gt; &gt; To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
> list
> > > archives,
> > > > &gt; &gt; please visit:
> > > > &gt; &gt; http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > > &gt; &gt;
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt;
> > > > &gt; _______________________________________________
> > > > &gt; To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives,
> > > > please visit:
> > > > &gt; http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > > &gt;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to