Yes and no.....
Since his fps is at 60, he probably has vertical sync on, and the monitor
vertical refresh set to 60Hz. Which means there is probably an annoying
flicker as most people can discern this flicker at 60Hz vertical refresh
rates. You may not be able to tell the difference between 60fps and higher,
but the vertical scan rate of 60Hz makes my eyeballs bulge out of their
sockets. I run at 75HZ vertical scan, and that smooths it out quite nicely.
And that nvreffix tool is great!!!
FWIW...I usually run at 85fps or higher, frequently maxed at 99fps. It's one
of those "my *** is bigger than your is" things :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wrath_of_Ace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Pro questions
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> Dan
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kelly Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:50 AM
> Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Pro questions
>
>
> >
> > Whats the problem? 60 fps? As far as the human eye is concerned there
is
> > no difference between 99 fps and 60 fps. Do you need 99 fps just so you
> can
> > tell people it is that high?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Kiblin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:01 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Windows 2000 Pro questions
> >
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I upgraded my main machine from Windows Me to Windows 2000 Professional,
> > same hardware, etc.
> >
> > My FPS in-game went from 99.99 to 60.00 consistently..I'm trying
> > everything, but so far nothing has helped, I've used a .bat file with
> start
> > /home, tweaked the crap outta Windows 2000, etc.
> >
> > Do I just have to live with this frame loss since I moved from ME to
> > 2K? Its a P3 1GHz, 512MB ram, GF2 Pro w/64MB ram.
> >
> > Need help!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
