And technically you are BOTH wrong... the human eye CAN see up to around 72
fps...
Secondly your missing the point. the main reason you want numbers such as
100 fps is for headroom. It's not as much about running at 100fps as it is
that there are times when your framerate will drop...
the higher the fps the better
Later
C
-----Original Message-----
From: Wrath_of_Ace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Pro questions
I totally agree with you.
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Pro questions
>
> Whats the problem? 60 fps? As far as the human eye is concerned there is
> no difference between 99 fps and 60 fps. Do you need 99 fps just so you
can
> tell people it is that high?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Kiblin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Windows 2000 Pro questions
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I upgraded my main machine from Windows Me to Windows 2000 Professional,
> same hardware, etc.
>
> My FPS in-game went from 99.99 to 60.00 consistently..I'm trying
> everything, but so far nothing has helped, I've used a .bat file with
start
> /home, tweaked the crap outta Windows 2000, etc.
>
> Do I just have to live with this frame loss since I moved from ME to
> 2K? Its a P3 1GHz, 512MB ram, GF2 Pro w/64MB ram.
>
> Need help!
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
>
