------Transcript of session follows -------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intended recipient's mailbox is full.
--- Begin Message ---
------Transcript of session follows -------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intended recipient's mailbox is full.
--- Begin Message ---
------Transcript of session follows -------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The intended recipient's mailbox is full.
--- Begin Message ---
> Why is this so definately "malarky"? You don't think its
> possible that
> through a higher level of error checking you could introduce several
> (15-20) milliseconds of additional latency? I don't think its utterly
> ridiculous as a possibility.
Error checking and correction built into the TCP/IP protocol, and is handled
at the receiving host. There is no error checking of packets by routers.
StanTheMan
TheHardwareFreak
www.hardwarefreak.devastation.cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
