What about the fact that 2003 is server only and hence has a HUGE
price tag. Game servers on windows ( if you must ) = Windows XP
for that very reason IMO its just not viable to pay for a 2003 server
licence to run game servers.
Steve / K
----- Original Message -----
From: "BeNt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> I've run both with a dual xeon with ht and to tell you the truth I saw no
> difference in the two as far as hlds is concerned.But I would go with 2k3
> now,for the simple fact it supposed to be more "secure".But as far as
> performance they both act the same.And as far as the "more network like" I
> don't see how as 2k3 is basically the same thing with newer version of the
> same software.(ie: IIS,DNS,POP3,ect,ect)
> BeNt
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or
entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is
prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any
information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone
(023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
