I'm betting one of two things is going to happen.  First one would be
that tomorrow is April 1st.  They could do a "fake" release of VAC2 as
an April fools joke.  Secondly, they could play it off like an April
Fools joke and then have it really be active and ban a butt load of
cheaters.  I would prefer the latter but I have a gut feeling that it
won't be.

Zack

Gerald Hefty wrote:

Napier, Kevin wrote:

Nearly possitive it's for source products only.  But one can still
hold out hope.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2.


This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Yup, I can't wait until that's announced.

Alexander Kobbevik wrote:



Has Valve said anything about what VAC2 will be for?
HalfLife2 engine only? Or others like HalfLife1/Counter-Strike?

-Alex


-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roc Sent: 31. mars 2005 11:04 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2.




Alexander Kobbevik wrote:





Why do you think it is fair to warn of a possible anti-cheat that
will






work?

We are talking about a serious company here. And I only said it's fair
to announce the start of a new system. They want as much players as
possible, this is the way to go.






If I am correct the have the largest MP following!
And as for fair, they were fair to give the warning as we all saw
last week
when we launced STEAM. ;)







So that the possible cheating Admin can say gee, valve I'm not a
cheater,






I was just testing the hack to see how it works!

Hum? I suggested a delay in the execution of the bans, not a second
chance for the cheater. Everyone will be banned for cheating, but a
delay will catch more ignorant cheaters and create a fear of the
unknown. Like this: A cheat developer swims out on open sea... no
sharks... tells his "children" that its safe...
They all jump in and start swimming.. only to find out the shark
has been
observing.. and will now eat them all..
Instead of just eating the cheat tester because people noticed he got




eaten.






Don't you think for a minute that is exactly what has been done all
these
months whilst we sat here bitching about "when is a vac update
coming out"
I for one hope they already have a database on potentials!







Warning gives them the opportunity to protect themselves and why
would
you






want to protect a cheater?

I don't want to warn a cheater, but again; Valve is a serious company.
You can't do whatever you feel like when trying to be serious.






See, this is why I believe your method is not the best!

A warning does nothing but let the cheaters know their hack is
broken. The
game is not that expensive so they'll have a few spare keys to use
testing
the new hack. Then the new hack is released and what happens now is
that all
the cheaters who were warned will have saved the entire cheat world by
telling of their warnings

Everyone then downloads new hack and cheating resumes without being
caught
and resulting in no bans till VAC figures they're cheating once
again and
tries to figure out how to stop the said hack!

That being said cheat authors branch out like trees and start
creating more
cheats and that is worse because now we end up in a loop like the
old VAC
days waiting around to play catchup

Playing possum and watching them as you cheat as you suggest will
serve no
purpose as long as VAC2 can guarantee that when it catches someone
they are
in fact really cheating







VAC will always be updated whenever a new cheat is released so long
the






project doesn't fall apart.

Does this mean that we know VAC will be updated on the fly?
If so, great. No need for a delay.







It can only be updated as long as it keeps up with the cheats and we
continue to help by informing them of new cheats and cheat sites
when they
pop up.





But he will know it when all the little cheaters run to his forums
and/or






email him!  Then he removes cheat and valve cant ban him because they
waited and gave him a chance.

Again: noone is asking cheaters to be given a chance to get away.
(Except that Fred - Prism128 ;))

-Alex






True h4x0r material :)

Regards





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds








_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



I've always figured it was for source games only, but the bit about
nosteam being detected makes me think (and hope) otherwise. I seriously
doubt they'd stop nosteam from working on source games but not on HL1
based games.

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to