Considering there is NO real effective anticheat measures through valve for either of these groups, by moving forward with Source games only, they would effectively win our (Source server ops) continued business AND we would strongly encourage HL1 users to upgrade.
HL1 users would be in the same position they are now, and by learning HL2/Source servers/games are utilizing new state of the art anti-cheat measures - I would bet a majority of them would purchase the upgrade. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deadman Standing Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. Hmm, currently according to steam: Hl1 users online: 113,000+ Hl1 Servers online: 55,700+ Source users online: 49,000+ Source Servers online: 19,400+ It is always a good business model to piss off the majority of your customers (2.3 times more hl1 players). -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mason Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. Hopefully VAC2 will work ONLY for Source games and ONLY on secure servers. I would love to have one single focused platform which Valve continually updates instead of them trying to half-ass support everything out there. Let's move forward with Source and make secure servers the place to play! _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
