Agreed.......
I purchased HL2 which came with CS:S which I thought was a pretty cool bonus. I played and beat HL2 where as I can't seem to stand playing CS:S.For some reason,like said,I guess its just not mature enough.Its a good game but I still enjoy playing CS1.6 alot more than I do CS:S right now.So maybe it will follow the same route as CS did as far as bug getting fixed and hopefully one day it will be as big as CS1.6.Anywho thats my input.
BeNt
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It could not have been better said. Ray S.
-----Original Message----- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Kobbevik I would bet a majority of them would purchase the upgrade.
Almost all people I know (IRL) who plays Halflife did already buy HalfLife2 with CS:S, tested it, then went back to CS1.6. To me its clear that CS:S is not mature enough yet. Most people I have spoken to don't like it, but they have the game. To me it seems Valve already got their money for the "upgrade".
And don't forget the hardware requirement for HalfLife2 compared to HalfLife1.
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
