15 myg0ts get on and proceed to voteban everyone else off the goodguy system... Myg0t wins again.
-- TJ Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 4/13/05, Allen 'Uncanny' Schott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about a "Good Guy" system which would work the opposite of a ban list. > > I would work something like this: > > 1. The player signs up, for free, at a website and is granted instant access > to "Good Guy" servers. Supplied info from player would be minimal to avoid > issues with the under 14 players and such. Just the email address (the > player would have to reply to activate) and thier SteamID would really be > all you needed. > > 2. With an Admin plugin, only "Good Guy" players can join a "Good Guy" > protected server. > > 3. All players on the server are able to police themselves, when there is no > Admin present, with majority votes to kick or ban (revoke "Good Guy" status) > with a plugin. > > 4. The players could vote to start a demo on the suspected player (which > would be silent, all players except the suspect would vote). Maybe set up > the plugin to send copies of the log to the master system for review (to see > if the player was just being lippy and pissed everyone off, ect...). > > 5. Revoked players would be able to appeal the revoked status. Set up a set > number of times a player may be revoked and reinstated before they are > ineligible to be a "Good Guy". > > I've been thinking about this for months. Now, where are the real holes? > Of course, it will be a pain cuz players won't want to sign up, but then > again, players who are tired of the hackers might find some refuge in the > idea. I think the best part is: The legit players can police themselves. > Myself, if I see a player being an ass on my team, I want him gone too. > > Thoughts? > > Uncanny > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
