On 8/5/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, multi-million/multi-billion dollar companies are worried about > paying for iis, you're right...
Actually, many of them are. The reason is that in fact, it's not just IIS you buy is it? And you wouldn't want to host off of un-managed workstations now would you? IIS' advantages are not as a static page web server, meaning it is highly likely that IIS is not your sole purchase. As with every deployment of every project everywhere, the designers will choose a product based upon the project criteria, IIS and apache do not necessarily fit the same projects. FYI the web servers which have these levels of load are not web-public. There are very few web-public sites which require a massively sophisiticated web server, even for what would be considered "3rd Term Traffic". Global corporate intranet servers used on a per-minute basis by most members of departments on the other hand can ruck up 100,000 hits during coffee time. End of discussion. > On 8/4/05, James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > there is, apache is free. > > > -- > Clayton Macleod > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
