--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Since I could not be 100% sure which STEAM Forum moderator locked the
perfectly legitmate thread, I'm afraid you all get tarred with the same
brush, even if you did not agree with the actions of the moderator in
question.

Hell, the existance of the thread explained to a great deal of people, which
many of them thanked me for in the thread, for explaining to them something
were not aware of, and more importantly, an issue 95% of the respondants
thought was a very serious issue in a FIRST PERSON SHOOTING game.

This is the issue I raised in the forums with proof below so those of you
will know what the hell it is I am talking about:

The original version of this thread had not degenerated into spam.
>
> Many people were not aware of the issue and the thread served an important
> purpose of informing those people of what the issue was.
>
> Funnily enough, when it was clearly demonstrated to them what the issue
> was, most of them wanted the issue fixed.
>
> The only purpose served by locking the orginal version of the thread, was
> to save Valve from the embarrasment of having a [b]BUG[/b] that may be
> difficult from Valve's Point Of View to fix!
>
> Locking threads is not going to make this issue go away, no matter how
> much some of you wish it would, or are you all just happy to bury your heads
> in the sand and keep locking threads on this issue in the hopes people will
> just forget about it?
>
> Well the previous [url=
> http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=395733]TheOfficial
>  Crouched Point of View Change Petition Thread[/url] was locked with
> no explanation or official announcement whatsoever, although funnily enough
> it was fairly soon after it was clearly demonstrated that there was 400
> votes [b]FOR[/b] and 5 Votes [b]AGAINST[/b] and a 95% to 5% ratio of
> [b]YES[/b] to [b]NO[/b]Votes which ultimately proved that it almost
> everybody but Valve consider this a fairly serious issue.
>
> But here it is again.
>
> If the other thread was locked in error, please unlock it and lock this
> one.
>
> If there is an official announcement to be made on the issue, please make
> it.
>
> Please do not lock threads for no apparent reason.
>
> Thank You
>
> [b][u][size=4][color=red]The Official Crouched Point of View Change
> Petition[/color][/size][/u][/b]
>
> Please Vote in the thread by replying with a post stating Yes or No and
> the reason why you feel the change should or should not be made to:
>
> [b][size=2][color=white]Valve, please Change the Crouched Point of View in
> Counter-Strike:Source, so it is at the same level as your Models Eye height
> would be
>
> YES or NO and the reason why you feel the change should or should not be
> made[/color][/size][/b]
>
> DON'T JUST VIEW THE THREAD, CLICK REPLY AND THEN TYPE YOUR ANSWER
> YES or NO
>
> Make sure you give some reason why you agree or disagree why the crouched
> POV should be changed, lest some moderators decide to lock the thread again,
> because apparently you are not allowed to provide one word responses to a
> tightly defined problem.
>
> [u][b]More Information:[/b][/u]
>
> I think that there is hardly a Counter-Strike:Source player who thinks the
> current crouched Point of View ([b]POV[/b]) is fair or even correct.
>
> If you do think it is fair and correct, then I feel you would be in the
> minority.
>
>
>
> For those of you who are not familiar with the problem, it can be
> explained like this:
>
> When you are standing, your POV is as if you are looking out through the
> model at the same level your eyes would be on the model.
>
> When you are crouched, your POV is as if you are looking out through the
> model at the same level your [b]CROTCH[/b] would be on the model.
>
> See attached pictures if you need visual aids to understand the problem.
>
> [url=http://whisper.ausgamers.com/pictures/crouchpovbug1.jpg]Crouch POV on
> Standing player[/url]
> [url=http://whisper.ausgamers.com/pictures/crouchpovbug2.jpg]Crouch POV on
> Crouched player[/url]
>
> These 2 Avi File links provided by UnknownFactor demonstrate the
> ridiculousness of the situation
>
> [url]http://www.snipers-alley.com/pov1.avi[/url] 1.33MB
> [url]http://www.snipers-alley.com/pov2.avi[/url] 1.48MB
>
> As well as these 2 Screenshot links provided by Que
>
> [url]http://img66.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dedust200434dq.jpg[/url]
> [url]http://img66.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dedust200444bq.jpg[/url]
>
>
> This is neither fair nor equitable as standing players will have a clear
> view of crouching players, but the crouching players have no view of players
> who can clearly see them.
>
> Quite often this leads to players being shot when they think they are
> under cover, when in fact, they are not.
>
> The reason this petition is being created, is simply that it has been
> stated by several sources within Valve that they are not looking at the
> crouched POV issue whatsoever, and do not even consider it a problem or a
> bug, and in fact consider it a deliberate design feature.
>
> Obviously I disagree with them, and I think a significant majority of
> other Counter-Strike:Source players of both public and competitive playing
> persuasions (you know there is a big problem when you can get both these
> groups to agree on anything) will agree with me.
>
> Also I have heard the argument made from Valve, is that the movement while
> crouched looks very bad in first person if you shift the POV to eye level. I
> would counter that statement by simply saying that most people do not spend
> an inordinate amount of time moving around the map whilst crouched,
> [b]AND[/b] even if it does have some display issues, these are outweighed by
> the benefit of being able to clearly see how you are positioned in relation
> to your surroundings and being able to see other players when they can see
> you.
>
> [url]http://img3.imageshack.us/my.php?image=naamloos8yz.jpg[/url]
>
> If Valve would care to comment on why they are not willing to change the
> crouched POV, we all would certainly like to hear the rationale with some
> specific examples.
>
> So the only way to make Valve aware that we consider this to be a major
> issue that should be revised considerably and changed, since the
> overwhelming majority of Counter-Strike:Source players think there is a
> problem, and what is more, agree on what the solution is, is to get as many
> [b]YES[/b] votes in this thread as possible.
>
> If we get thousands of replies all saying [b]YES[/b] the crouched POV
> should be changed, then perhaps Valve will take what we have to say
> seriously, and not disregard our feelings on this issue.
>
> I know there are other issues that demand Valves attention, but most of
> them are bugs that will in fact be fixed sooner or later, but this issue
> will never be fixed as Valve do not agree with us that there is any problem.
>
> Tell all your friends, tell all the Counter-Strike News Sites about this
> thread, post in all the game forums outide of here to get as many votes as
> possible.
>
> Vote [b]YES[/b] in this thread if you want the Crouched POV changed to the
> Eye Height of the Model.
>
> Cheers
> [url=http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Warstrats]Whisper[/url]



FYG Munra I have put
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Tickrateback since
obviously my presence has been missed by somebody.

The STEAM Forums Moderators are on their own though.

On 6/14/06, Kevin Ottalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The info there is to help players with problems whisper, sorry if one of
> the
> mods there upset you.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Whisper"
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] [OT]Whisper's Tick rate Wiki
>
>
> The STEAM Forum moderators seemed to have no problem locking other
> perfectly
> legitamate threads I created, claiming they were just spam threads, so I
> removed my support for the STEAM Forums.
>
> I was also informed my contributions would not be missed.
>
> Oh well.
>
> On 6/14/06, Kevin Ottalini wrote:
> >
> > The Steam moderators did not delete it, Whisper did for some reason.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Danila"
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] [OT]Whisper's Tick rate Wiki
> >
> >
> > Munra -hlds пишет:
> > > http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Tickrate
> > >
> > > IS this page Located any Where else?? This was the best Article about
> > > tickrate and something I uses to explain what tickrate is.  Why would
> > the
> > > steam STEAM Forum Moderators delete it.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to