-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] That's what we see as well
On identical hardware & OS we can run 4 x 24 player 66 tick 500 fps SRCDS OR 4 x 64 player BF2 Multiply that out a few times and you get a significant difference in overall player numbers for your organisation. On 10/14/07, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John, manually setting affinity is going to nothing much... I see the same > thing on my linux box which is dual 3.0 xeons.... With a full 24 person, > which it is right now im looking at 80%cpu and 4.1mem... I have HT on, > that's the only diff... Yet When I have 30 people in my BF2 server I don't > see any higher than 35% CPU... Pulling stats while its full the fps bumps > between 120 and 30... I'm running CentOS 4.3. This is nothing new to what > I > have seen. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 7:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [hlds] Still suffering linux related low fps high cpu > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Hi Chaps, > > A few weeks ago someone suggested compiling a low latency kernel, > tickless > for high fps which we have progressed and done. > > My box is a dual xeon 2.6ghz, HT is turned off and just the two cpu's > are > showing up. Its identical to my windows box in terms of hardware and > setup. > > On my windows box I have 3 TF2 Servers and 1 TFC server running, when > full > task manager reports around 85% cpu usage and no fps related problems > (although similar cpu loads being reported). > > Yet on the linux box it drops to 10fps, now with 14 players its fine > > 21:39:53 CPU In Out > Uptime Users > FPS Players > 45.00 35178.93 38394.59 210 4 493.83 14 > > Soon as it hits 18+ it goes off the boat... > > 21:31:36 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 83.33 48139.13 79145.84 202 3 11.23 19 > > 21:33:24 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 83.75 54450.20 113019.84 203 3 13.33 22 > > If you look at top you see its hammering the server. > > top - 21:36:51 up 5:25, 1 user, load average: 1.36, 1.27, 1.22 > Tasks: 60 total, 5 running, 55 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 48.5%us, 4.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 46.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.7%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 3767424k total, 1097880k used, 2669544k free, 44068k buffers > Swap: 1518100k total, 0k used, 1518100k free, 628592k cached > > PID PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 12268 25 0 230m 169m 22m R 73 4.6 59:40.89 srcds_i486 > 12154 15 0 98300 70m 6592 R 19 1.9 33:39.28 hlds_i686 > 11989 15 0 77908 57m 6248 R 9 1.6 25:21.40 hlds_i686 > 12323 15 0 207m 144m 22m S 6 3.9 9:17.43 srcds_i486 > > This server is running 1 x TF2 22 man server 1 x TF2 20 man server 1 x > TFC > 14 man server and 1 x TFC 20 man server. > > My windows box is running 1 x TFC 14 man server, 1 x TF2 20 man server, > 1 > x TF2 18 man serverx 1 x TF2 18 man server. > > As you can see the CPU load, at the moment the fps dropped to 11fps the > box was hardly busy. > > At the same time this was my windows box.... > > 4:27025 > 21:44:20 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 53.85 52241.09 128488.64 39 0 441.99 19 > > .4:27035 > 21:45:25 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 48.46 53325.14 63532.80 3228 69 261.63 18 > 21:45:29 stats > > .4:27045 > 21:46:23 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 55.86 48499.68 98046.57 4857 111 256.18 18 > > Short term im going to drop the linux servers down to 18 slots and up > the > Windows ones a bit to see what effect taht has but I have another windows > server setup to 24 slots and it has no problems either... > > .129:27035 > 21:47:25 CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players > 43.42 62050.84 105045.49 34 1 510.61 24 > > All 3 machines are dual xeon 2.6ghz with HT disabled. > > AS these are my public boxes I know nothing else is running on the > hardware at the same time and its not shared the only difference is > linux/Windows. > > I heard people talking about manually assinging the afinity, does that > make much of a difference? Or has anyone else found any other tricks? > > Much appreciated. > > John > > > > --------------------------------- > For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this > month. > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
