Since you can download the server side binaries someone with enough interest, experience and time could easily (?) reverse engineer the important parts to find out what they need anyway. Someone like say a cheat programmer. Sure, it would make it harder for the bad guys but only for a while, after that time is over it's still going to be closed for the good guys and which competent admin with self-respect is going to run plugins without having access to the source? That's when problems like these happen.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:53 AM, HL-SDK Synths <[email protected]> wrote: > Open source anticheat are ineffective > > On Aug 2, 2010 6:51 PM, "Donnie Newlove" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good, since that thing is closed source with minimal documentation it > should really not be doing anything but what it says it does. Too bad > it doesn't really say. Of course I understand the reasons but it's a > shame the code is not open, it looks like it would have been a useful > plugin. > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, AnAkIn . <[email protected]> wrote: >> DBlocker used to be a leag... > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
