PB had a large team behind it, I was actually one of them (a rather
silent linux consultant :) I am not sure why tony shut up shop yet, but
I can tell you he has been under significant financial and time strains
and from what I saw Valve was not willing to come to the party (they
even talked about doing it themselves....)
Sysop wrote:
>
> And where have you been? It IS more than just Tony Ray. He has a whole
> team of programmers, cheat researchers, testers, etc etc...
>
> It's NOT just one guy.
>
> I've held my tongue through out most of this, in wait for a possible
> rebuttal by Valve, as I refuse to base my thoughts and positioning off of
> one persons side of the story...
>
> Please, valve, setup up to the plate, set the record straight? Quell the
> rumors?
>
> Ketchup writes:
>
>>
>> Hello SQLBoy,
>>
>> Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 9:34:39 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> It makes no sense to go open source. Since PB was basically reacting to
>>> cheats, if cheat coders had the source, they would know exactly how to
>>> circumvent the software.
>>
>>
>> Maybe it does not make sense to go open source, but it DOES make sense
>> to have more than one person develop a program like punkbuster ... to
>> be able to react just in time and not several days or weeks later.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Peter aka Ketchup
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www.pommesbude.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ~~~~
> Revenge is a dish best served Colt...
>
--
Alfred Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
