10/06/2002 23:02:21, "James Gurney" wrote: >> But I guess asking people to switch email clients is out of the >> question, so... :) > >This is going wildly off topic again, but if you can suggest a Windows based >mail client that doesn't suck, I'd be happy to switch (As far as I can tell, >they all suck, but with varying degrees of suckiness - the trick is to chose >the least sucky one). The best recommendation I've had from anyone has been >to use "The bat!" (http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/) , but as far as I can >tell, it has a user interface designed by a collaberation of the ICQ >interface designers, and a group of crack smoking monkeys. > >I don't mind using a unix mail client like mutt or whatever, but when you >need to check multiple pop3 accounts and reply from any one of about 10 >email addresses, a Windows client makes life so much easier...
Try Sylpheed. After being a stalwart Xemacs+VM user for many years I finally decided that its memory overhead was just too much for me (not to mention the clunkiness of interfacing with GPG).. in my search for the holy grail of MUA's, Sylpheed is about the best I've found. I use the CLAWS version, for that better bite :) http://sylpheed-claws.sourceforge.net/ Regards joev. _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
