James Sykes wrote (at Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:15:57AM +0100): > Nice graphs there :)
Thanks. I just made the code available by popular demand: http://bfb.bogleg.org/stats/code/ It's a bit of a pain in the ass to implement, but it works for me. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Casey Zacek > Sent: 31 July 2003 10:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] 3.1.1.1d Performance > > > Casey Zacek wrote (at Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:52:44AM -0500): > > Alfred Reynolds wrote (at Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:48:32PM -0700): > > > If you are using "hlds" then you are still running 3.1.1.0. You need to > run > > > hlds_run (or hlds_$CPU directly) to run 3.1.1.1d. > > > > Well, gee.. no wonder the performance is the same. > > > > I'll post more results later, then. > > ... and now is later. > > http://bfb.bogleg.org/stats/index.cgi?g=h&s=bfb-cs1 > http://bfb.bogleg.org/stats/index.cgi?g=h&s=bfb-cs2 > > The latter gets more play. Anyway, the bottom graph charts CPU per > player (percent of ONE CPU, not both). 3.1.1.1d (hlds_amd) is about > the same as 3.1.1.0c using -pingboost 2. I haven't asked the players > how the pings compare, and I haven't actually played CS in months.. -- -- Casey Zacek (Zippo) Beer for Breakfast servers 66.111.111.66:27015 (CS multi-map) <http://bfb.bogleg.org/> 66.111.111.66:27016 (CS inferno/dust2/aztec/militia) Dallas, TX 66.111.111.66:14567 (BF1942) _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
