You are proving nothing. You are offering opinions and just assuming your programs are correct.
In his defence, he's showing you hard numbers, not opinions, and yes, he's assuming that proc isn't lying. Has innacurate proc info been a major issue reported by anyone else in any other role before, or is this the first time anyone has ever discounted someone's results and "ASSUMING that his programs are INcorrect"?
When we all know it is just impossible for the 1% you quote to be true.if you came on the list and gave a low but believable number you might not get all the flack, but common, 1%? Something is wrong in that machine, just face it. Lets do a test.
Yes, let's. How about running SETI and seeing what happens?
-- Eric (the Deacon remix)
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
