Do you have any 'base line' suggestions for adjusting the rate / cl_updaterate / cl_cmdrate ? next to the defaults?
Thanks J! ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:33 PM Subject: RE: -pingboost 3 and low sys_ticrate RE: [hlds_linux] Re: The best OS for the server debian/freebsd > You see choke because your server is outperforming your client. Choke IS NOT > a bad thing. Just adjust your rates to your client only recieves the number > of updates it can handle. > > Jeremy > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Britt > Priddy (PZGN) > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: -pingboost 3 and low sys_ticrate RE: [hlds_linux] Re: The > best OS for the server debian/freebsd > > > When I use pingboost 1 or pingboost 3 on a P4 1.7ghz - 1gig ddram - I see > alot of choke - with one 20 player server running - CPU has 256k cache - I > do not see this or need pingboost on CPU's using 512k cache nor on Intel > Celerons 1.7ghz having 128k cache (using Pingboost 1) - no choke occurs... > Using Redhat 8 - with all up2date crap install - minimal install - no GUI / > XWin, etc... I use the P4 1.7ghz - Gen. Intel 256k CPU cache and if no > pingboost specified the FPS is around 49-50 - with pingboost 1 - it jumps up > to 97-99FPS - but see extreme choke - only 1 hlds process running on this > box.... I'm one confused mofo now. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
