9:13pm up 413 days, 6:01, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Linux version 2.4.18 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)) #1 SMP Tue May 7 19:02:35 EDT 2002
Default kernel even. RH has proven stable for me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brett Fernicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Can't open libhlwon.so? > My point exactly, > > Many admins slap on a default Red Hat install which is full of usesless shit > are more open to exploits, and then smoke a joint and call it a day. > > Yes if you take the time you can get Red Hat 9 running fairly well, but few > people take that time or have the knoweldge to do so. > > Also Red Hat's install is no where near as good or selective as expert mode > in Slackware!! Expert mode in slackware really lets you see everything > thats going into the system, where as Red Hat lumps stuff togeter. > > If you want extreme performance then All I have to say is try out Slackware > or SOL linux. I stick with Slackware 9.1 and its trully great. > > I also feel that slackware has better stability then Red Hat in my > expeirence. My cs servers can go an easy 60 days with out one crash or > restart. I know some of you have servers that crash at least once a day > dont lie. > > also > > The Slackware Philosophy > Since its first release in April of 1993, the Slackware Linux Project has > aimed at producing the most "UNIX-like" Linux distribution out there. > Slackware complies with the published Linux standards, such as the Linux > File System Standard. We have always considered simplicity and stability > paramount, and as a result Slackware has become one of the most popular, > stable, and friendly distributions available. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Garner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 5:57 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Can't open libhlwon.so? > > > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:37 AM [GMT+1200=NZT], > > Charles Capps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > More than you might think. Many dedicated hosting providers just > > > slap a default install image on the disk and call it a day. > > > > > > > Sure - but don't complain if the default isn't what you want. > > > > -Simon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
