It's been shown that hlds runs better on AMD processors. I would go for the Opteron its a 64/32bit processor . Even though the clock speed is lower its still a faster processor ie since its 64 bit and yadda yadda yadda.
Matt H. On Tuesday 18 November 2003 08:44 am, Christopher Choo wrote: > Hi Guys, > > We're thinking of replacing our current Pentium 4 2.66GHz server with > either a Dual Xeon 2.66GHz, or a dual AMD Opteron 240 (1.4GHz). I've been > trying to search for reviews that have pit the low-end Opterons with the > mid-range Xeons, but I've not been able to find anything useful. > > At present the cost of a dual Xeon server is very close to that of a > low-end dual Opteron, and I'd just like to ask if anybody has had any > success with running the 64-bit HLDS binaries. Which chip runs better? > > One little gripe would be that we're still running a few CS1.5 servers as > well, but planning ahead and looking a little into the future we're > seriously considering that the Opteron has something to offer in the long > run. > > Anybody with real-world results that could help me to make a decision? > > Regards, > > Christopher Choo > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Fragnetics > http://www.fragnetics.com > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
