I would pay ~1$ per month (ok, I'm german, I would pay 1 euro! :D) if there is a garantee that valve is updating VAC daily! It should not be possible to get a running cheat for longer than xx hours.
Maybe they invent the cheater-free dedicated server with a small license of ~2-5$ a month. I would pay for. But in future I will not buy a game without cheatprotection! Punkbuster is going the right way with guid and hardware id ;) (with the hardware ID ban valve will no longer gain extra cash from cheaters ^^) [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 21.10.04 11:17:30: > > heh, it's not like they need to buy anything to get a new steamid :| > > VALVe have done a fair bit for us, at least they haven't turned into a > MMORPG style forced pay-per-month after you buy the game initially > (whoever came up with that idea was mentally dull - I mean, what if you > don't -want- the 'free' expansion packs that come with them :p). > > Yar, so anyway, they don't have anything to gain by keeping VAC updated > other then a bit of respect atm, since the vac disabler + non-steam > pretty much put the idea of paying money for a new key after cheating > out of the situation. > > - Bruce "Bahamut" Andrews > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >They don't gain money from that old game? Come on... 10 bucks to be payed by > >a cheater who was catched by VAC. There are enough outside I think. Players > >changing their steam IDs due to a VAC catch, only to be able to play ESL and so > >on... > >Valve gained a lot of money in selling CZ. More money they gained after they > >published > >that CS:S beta will only be able to CZ users... (and more bought CZ). > > > >Valve still has a responsibility to the community. For me I can say, that CS:S is > >not > >my multiplayer future. Just in time I'm playing more and more bfv and et ;) > > > >We've currently changed our 3 public servers from VAC to CD (optional w/ mediator) > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 21.10.04 10:27:21: > > > > > >>meh, the problem is that stupid vac disabler which makes VAC useless. > >>If that were eliminated it'd probably be a whole lot more useful - at > >>the moment enabling VAC on your servers is the same as not when it comes > >>to an "informed" cheater. > >> > >>They don't gain money out of keeping up anti-cheat protection on a seven > >>year old game though :/ > >> > >>- Bruce "Bahamut" Andrews > >> > >> > >> > >>Matt Judge wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Daniel wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>It isnt if its worked on moron... > >>>> > >>>>Daniel > >>>> > >>>> > >>>LOL, gotta love the mentally retarded trolls. That sentence held zero > >>>content of useful information. > >>> > >>>But that is the problem, it is not updated as frequently as the > >>>alternative 3rd party software. We have had VAC for a couple of years > >>>now and it has had only one period of maybe 2 months where it was > >>>updated on a regular basis. From past experience, there is nothing to > >>>show that this is going to change any time soon. > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >>>please visit: > >>>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > >>visit: > >>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
