It doesn't look like they actually use any Level3 right now, at least on the
inbound.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# traceroute www.fdcservers.net
traceroute to fdcservers.net (66.90.66.135) from 64.94.100.102, 30 hops max,
38 byte packets
1 3-0.router.la.losangeles.nuclearfallout.net (64.94.101.254) 0.303 ms
0.435 ms 0.171 ms
2 ge-3-1-542.ipcolo2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.78.194.49) 0.447 ms 0.667
ms 0.432 ms
3 4.68.113.161 (4.68.113.161) 0.536 ms 0.668 ms 0.679 ms
4 4.68.128.157 (4.68.128.157) 12.345 ms ge-0-1-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net
(64.159.1.129) 12.259 ms 4.68.128.157 (4.68.128.157) 12.078 ms
5 so-6-0-0.edge2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.121.194) 12.545 ms 12.636 ms
so-7-0-0.edge2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.121.198) 12.620 ms
6 cogent-level3-oc48.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.127.202) 12.572 ms
cogent-level3-oc48.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.127.18) 12.626 ms 12.711 ms
7 p6-3.core01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.233) 13.303 ms 13.284 ms
13.230 ms
8 p4-0.core01.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.93) 13.220 ms 13.134 ms
13.047 ms
9 p14-0.core01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.186) 58.747 ms 58.800 ms
59.047 ms
10 p15-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.62) 58.782 ms 58.780 ms
58.893 ms
11 FDC_Servers.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.0.234) 65.012 ms 64.684 ms
64.475 ms
12 * * *
13 * * *
And I can only wonder why they're heavily prepending it.
router> sh ip bg 66.90.66.135
BGP routing table entry for 66.90.64.0/20
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
3356 174 30058 30058 30058 30058 30058 30058
x.x.x.x from x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 90, valid, external
Last update: Fri Dec 10 20:43:44 2004
(other bgp entry removed)
router>
If you want to put up a cheap webserver, you might consider that place. But
not if you want to put up game servers.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Colocation Question
Looking at that page for FDC, be careful. I see two providers, Level 3 and
Cogent. Level 3 is good, but if you do a lot of traffic across Cogent for a
game server you're going to have headaches.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Colocation Question
By the way, I asked this question originally awhile ago, and want to
finally
give my final finding. If anyone wants cheap colocation, and wants to
host
a lot of CS servers, (and even webservers once you see what I'm talkin
about), look at http://www.fdcservers.net/colocation.html . 100 Mbit
burstable, and if you look at Axia's graph,
http://www.axia.org.uk/server-graphs.php, that is incredible. The only
thing to worry about is the computing power! But, there is a small catch,
if you look into their forums it appears that occasionally they don't have
the best support, but if your looking at colo u know what your doing ;)
UNMETERED at these prices is the shizer! That puts one answer to the
colocation question, finally.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
