100 snaps would make no difference either tbh as the Q3 engine is internally capped at sv_fps 25 (may have been extended to 30 later), so you couldn't get more than that however hard you try.
Maybe thats what Valve could do, internally cap it and let everyone keep setting it to what they want and see how many notice ;). On 5/24/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not to mention any competitive quake3 play would be using 100 snaps, > not 20 or 30. > > On 5/24/05, Ian mu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree, 20 fps in those games and play fine. Fair enough hl may > > require more framerates for whatever reason, but these should be fixed > > at whatever is deemed the best figure to get decent playability. > > > > Probably the biggest question/issue I never see raised is "how much > > does you fps fluctuate by when busy". It's fine trying to get 1000 > > fps, but what are you getting when the servers are busy and all in use > > and loaded max? I bet they're not all happily running at 1000fps > > without a care in the world when full, so you get inconsistant > > servers. > > > > I still think the best way to go is get a decent setup and fix it, so > > every server out there is as consistant as possible, whether thats > > 100fps or 200 or whatever, none of this 1000fps showing what a great > > server it is until it gets busy, or half the servers running at 50fps, > > half at 1000. > > > > Ian > > > -- > Clayton Macleod > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
