yeah, you're right and I stand corrected, 89 watts vs 110 watts. I guess what I was thinking of was their heat output didn't prevent them from going in any socket 939 board that's followed AMD's specs all along. Because they still match earlier design specs in that regard.
On 6/23/05, Matt Donnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dont know where you read that, but it is incorrect. AMD-DC > have a higher heat load than equlivalent clock AMD-SC. > Thankfully, its still lower than the Intel prescott single > core TDP (and DC as well) which to my mind makes them a very > easy choice as a server for almost any function. > > Matt -- Clayton Macleod _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
